2. Guests/Presentations
a. AYP Update
Maureen Sabolinski, Michelle Kingsland-Smith
The MCAS Data was released today, posted to Schools website
2010 AYP Report to SC
The full report summary is shown here
There is good news in the report, no action items to really address.
The district remains at a high performance status.
There are areas that require work, Parmenter (ELL), Remington (year 1 of 2 in improving status)
Comprehensive plans (via the school improvement plans) to work on raising the performance.
The after school program will look to target the lower performing students for ELL and Math for after or before school. Individual student success plans to be developed and then work in small groups with teachers to get the extra help required.
Teachers to come from within the schools, positioned posted for teachers to apply to.
The MCAS bar is raising, 57% of the schools are in need of improvement against the standard. The bar will continue to raise until 2014. This is an increase from 53% in 2009.
We are teaching to the test. It is not a 'dirty term'. Those tests reflect the standards. We recognize the open response questions are what the students should be doing. We are also recognizing excellence in instruction.
Franklin, MA
Providing accurate and timely information about what matters in Franklin, MA since 2007. * Working in collaboration with Franklin TV and Radio (wfpr.fm) since October 2019 *
Showing posts with label AYP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AYP. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Live reporting - MCAS
Michelle Kingsland-Smith
Bobbi Gerlits
AYP - adequate yearly progress is a state measurement towards the overall target; four status category; no status, improvement (no improvement for 2 years running), corrective action (state interaction to provide assistance), state restructuring
performance highlights
Davis Thayer, top five performance in Grade 4 mathematics
Helen Keller, grade 5 mathematics, 94% of the students scored high
Grade 3, 4, 5 received very high scores in mathematics
Elementary made AYP in all groups and rankings
Middle School did not make AYP in subgroups
Middle schools
1 - idea of developmental learning process, state identifies a constant rate of change, we know from research and experience that students do not learn at a constant rate of change, compound that with the social and emotional challenges of the middle school age group
2 - when we talk about subgroups we usually talk about students with learning disabilities, progress usually is one year of growth per year, students with disabilities however need more time to make the development step; by the time they finish high school they meet the standards, having taken the time necessary to develop
3 - the test materials, learning standards increase exponentially in the middle school over the levels in the elementary schools. There is a ceiling in the 10th grade testing material, at an adult reading level.
High School
RTI - response to intervention, a framework to identify readers and reading levels
ISSP - individual student success plans, any student with a score between 220 and 238 has a plan to focus on their instruction and progress
Graduation requirements are changing for the students graduating in 2010, the passing score increases from 220 to 240 for both Math and English
Class of 2012 in addition to the Math, English and Science, they will also be required to pass a US History test
Bobbi Gerlits
AYP - adequate yearly progress is a state measurement towards the overall target; four status category; no status, improvement (no improvement for 2 years running), corrective action (state interaction to provide assistance), state restructuring
performance highlights
- district vs. State
- 98 Adams scholarship recipients
- school recognitions
- grade level recognitions
Davis Thayer, top five performance in Grade 4 mathematics
Helen Keller, grade 5 mathematics, 94% of the students scored high
Grade 3, 4, 5 received very high scores in mathematics
Elementary made AYP in all groups and rankings
Middle School did not make AYP in subgroups
- Horace Mann made AYP
- Remington ELA improvement year 1 - subgroups
- Annie Sullivan ELA improvement year 1 - subgroups
Middle schools
- Math, Science - Low Income in subgroup
- Math -Very Low in special education subgroup
1 - idea of developmental learning process, state identifies a constant rate of change, we know from research and experience that students do not learn at a constant rate of change, compound that with the social and emotional challenges of the middle school age group
2 - when we talk about subgroups we usually talk about students with learning disabilities, progress usually is one year of growth per year, students with disabilities however need more time to make the development step; by the time they finish high school they meet the standards, having taken the time necessary to develop
3 - the test materials, learning standards increase exponentially in the middle school over the levels in the elementary schools. There is a ceiling in the 10th grade testing material, at an adult reading level.
High School
- Math - low income made moderate improvement
- Biology for both Low income and Special Education subgroups, they were in the Low performance rating category
RTI - response to intervention, a framework to identify readers and reading levels
ISSP - individual student success plans, any student with a score between 220 and 238 has a plan to focus on their instruction and progress
Graduation requirements are changing for the students graduating in 2010, the passing score increases from 220 to 240 for both Math and English
Class of 2012 in addition to the Math, English and Science, they will also be required to pass a US History test
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)