Showing posts with label forum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label forum. Show all posts

Monday, April 18, 2022

Senator Rausch to host Youth Legislative Forum - Apr 25

SENATOR RAUSCH TO HOST YOUTH LEGISLATIVE FORUM 


The Senator invites students from her district to discuss issues facing their communities and share their statewide policy priorities. 


Senator Becca Rausch (D-Needham) will host her third Students Speak Youth Legislative Forum on Monday, April 25, 2022 from 7 - 8 PM on Zoom. This event is open to all middle and high schoolers attending school in the Senator's district. 


Senator Rausch wants to hear from students across her district concerning the issues facing their communities to inform her legislative work. The Senator also hopes to give youth an opportunity to participate in the democratic process through this forum, providing space to discuss current legislation on Beacon Hill and students' policy priorities.  


This will be the Senator's third youth legislative forum after hosting similar events back in April and November of 2021. In response to students' concerns about low levels of mental health within their school communities in her first Students Speak event, Rausch secured the state funding necessary for Samaritans, Inc. to launch Hey Sam!, a pilot text line to support youth in Massachusetts schools. 


"I am thankful for the perspectives and advocacy of young people in my district," said Senator Rausch. "This pandemic has been a difficult time for students, and now more than ever, it is critical that we as elected officials listen to the perspectives of young people. I am excited to continue learning from them and work towards legislative solutions that can support their unique needs."  


This event is open exclusively to students in Attleboro, Bellingham, Dover, Franklin, Medfield, Milford, Millis, Natick, Needham, Norfolk, North Attleboro, Plainville, Sherborn, Wayland, Wellesley, and Wrentham. 


To register for the event, visit www.beccarauschma.com/students-speak before Friday, April 22nd.  


Senator Becca Rausch represents the Norfolk, Bristol and Middlesex District, comprised of Attleboro, Franklin, Millis, Natick, Needham, Norfolk, North Attleboro, Plainville, Sherborn, Wayland, Wellesley, and Wrentham. Senator Rausch serves as the Senate Chair of the Joint Committee on Environment, Natural Resources, and Agriculture and the Senate Vice Chair of the Joint Committee on State Administration and Regulatory Oversight. 


To register for the event, visit www.beccarauschma.com/students-speak before Friday, April 22
To register for the event, visit www.beccarauschma.com/students-speak before Friday, April 22

Wednesday, April 13, 2022

Calling all middle/high school students! Senator Rausch schedules Youth Legislative Forum April 25 via Zoom


View this email in your browser

Hi ,

Are you a student in my district? Join me for my Spring Youth Legislative Forum on Monday, April 25 from 7-8 PM on Zoom!

This pandemic has been a difficult time for our communities, but particularly young people in our Commonwealth. I want to hear from students across my district about the issues facing our communities to inform my legislative work. In this forum, I also hope to give youth an opportunity to participate in the democratic process, providing space to discuss current legislation on Beacon Hill and students' policy priorities.

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Youth Legislative Forum 4/25/22

This event is open exclusively to high school and middle school students living or studying in Attleboro, Bellingham, Dover, Franklin, Medfield, Milford, Millis, Natick, Needham, Norfolk, North Attleboro, Plainville, Sherborn, Wayland, Wellesley, and Wrentham. If you know of any students interested in politics or community engagement, feel free to invite them!

If you have any questions, please email Evan Berry, Communications Director, at evan.berry@masenate.gov. See you soon!

Yours in service,  

Senator Becca Rausch   


Our mailing address is:
The Office of Senator Becca Rausch
Massachusetts State House, Room 218
24 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02133

Tuesday, April 12, 2022

Legislative Forum scheduled for April 14 has been canceled

"FYI: The Legislative Forum scheduled for April 14th has been canceled until further notice."

Shared from Twitter ->   https://twitter.com/FranklinPSNews/status/1513592431211597834 

Legislative Forum scheduled for April 14 has been canceled
Legislative Forum scheduled for April 14 has been canceled

Tuesday, April 5, 2022

School Committee - 5th Annual Legislative Forum - April 14

Join the School Committee as they host the 5th annual Legislative Forum on Thursday, April 14, 2022 from 6:30pm-8pm in the FHS Auditorium and via Zoom. Senate President Karen Spilka, State Senator Rebecca Rausch and State Representative Jeff Roy will be in attendance. Details coming soon!

Event Date:  Thursday, April 14, 2022 - 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM

You can connect to the webinar here: 
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84001769590?pwd=MFh0VXRRTzlsZ1hVNU5sUWpBbVl1UT09 
Passcode: 311405

Webinar ID: 840 0176 9590
Passcode: 311405

Please note that registration is not required to join the event.

School Committee - 5th Annual Legislative Forum - April 14
School Committee - 5th Annual Legislative Forum - April 14

Wednesday, March 9, 2022

Franklin For All - Visioning Survey Launched - Respond by April 1

Franklin For All - Visioning Survey Launched

Survey closes Friday, April 1, 2022

On March 7th, 2022, the Town of Franklin held a public forum to formally introduce the Franklin for All project, answer questions and engage with the community.

To ensure every Franklin stakeholder has an opportunity to provide feedback, we have launched a visioning survey that will be open till April 1, 2022. The data collected in this survey will be used by our project consultants at the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) to create zoning recommendations that would serve our collective vision for our downtown. The survey is anonymous and all questions are optional. 

To learn more about Franklin For All, visit our project webpage: https://www.mapc.org/resource-library/franklin-for-all/

Access the survey here: https://mapc.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/preview/SV_1SW9jOR99Rzvevk?Q_CHL=preview&Q_SurveyVersionID=current

The slideshow presented at the public forum on March 7, 2022 ->  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WHYDFaj-ZMlMF2ChexFaUy7qAfykLjvW/view?usp=sharing

There will be additional public engagement opportunities to comment on the draft zoning recommendations in the upcoming months. Want to stay informed on additional opportunities to provide feedback? Sign up for our email list and follow along with us on social media for all the latest Franklin For All updates!

Shared from Town of Franklin page -> https://www.franklinma.gov/home/news/franklin-all-visioning-survey-launched


Franklin For All - Visioning Survey Launched - Respond by April 1
Franklin For All - Visioning Survey Launched - Respond by April 1

Tuesday, March 8, 2022

Recap: Franklin For All Forum gets some input amid questions on MPAC and expressions of fear

Quick recap:
  • The Franklin For All Forum was a hybrid event hosted technically by MAPC in the Council Chambers. Some technical issues needed to be worked out so the meeting was slow starting
  • There were approx. 40-50 in room, another 100+ via Zoom, some other number (unknown) likely watching via cable or live stream
  • The Forum was meant to allow for (1) Q&A on the process and (2) input from Franklin residents to help develop a vision for downtown
  • EDC Plus Steering Committee Chair Melanie Hamblen provided some homework assignments (walk around Franklin, sign up for newsletter, checkout Franklin For All page, let's all be open and treat comments with respect)
  • Emma Battaglia, MAPC Project Manager, provided an overview of the project and objectives. She announced the release of the survey to enable input which will be open for at least a couple of weeks. A draft of initial zoning recommendations will come forward for review and discussion
  • The EDC Plus committee will hear and review, possibly propose something to the Town Council. Assuming the proposal includes zoning changes, the zoning changes would go to the Planning Board for their review (including 2 public hearings) before coming back to the Council. The Council would also hold a public hearing and have two readings of the changes before a final vote. Bottomline - plenty of time to review and discuss whatever changes do come from this study
My notes taken via Twitter are collected in the PDF here. The audio (and possible transcript of the audio) should be available in a couple of days.

The survey is open for your input ->   https://mapc.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bDBzodBPnt8a5Ce

Visit mapc.org/franklin-for-all for additional information on Franklin For All and for ongoing updates on the planning process. You can also sign up for email updates at mapc.ma/franklin-for-all-news.  Email planning@franklinma.gov if you have questions about this project or additional ideas for enhancing Franklin Center


Recap: Franklin For All Forum gets some input
Recap: Franklin For All Forum gets some input

Sunday, February 27, 2022

Economic Development Subcommittee - Agenda - March 2 - 5:45 PM

Economic Development Subcommittee Meeting
Agenda & Meeting Packet
March 2, 2022 - 5:45 PM

Meeting will be held at the Municipal Building, 2nd floor, Council Chambers, 355 East Central Street


Agenda: 
1. EDC + Steering Committee: Discussion from MAPC about the “Franklin For All” zoning reform project for Franklin Center, including the Downtown Commercial District and surrounding neighborhoods. To register for the Public forum on March 7th, 2022 click here -> https://zoom.us/meeting/register/tJUrdeutpzwvHdyO2z-d4dc6OS0py3faxZR7 

2. Downtown parking follow up from the Town Council meeting on February 16, 2022.

Agenda doc with remote connection info ->


Economic Development Subcommittee - Agenda - March 2 - 5:45 PM
Economic Development Subcommittee - Agenda - March 2 - 5:45 PM





Sunday, February 20, 2022

Learn about zoning in Franklin! View the Forum March 7

Join the Town of Franklin and MAPC for our first public forum on Monday, March 7 at 7PM! This will be a hybrid meeting that takes place in the Council Chambers at Town Hall (please note the change in location) and over Zoom. Click the link below to register and tell us if you plan to attend in person or remotely.

Register for the March 7 Forum

History of Zoning in Franklin
Franklin Center's building stock is largely historic, with two-thirds of the buildings having been built before WWII, and many much earlier. Franklin Center was predominantly developed around the turn of the 20th century, in the late Victorian/early Edwardian period from 1860 until the stock market crash in 1929. Close to 60% of all buildings in Franklin Center were built during this time, although some date back to the mid 18th century. 

 

Source: MA Land Parcel Database, Franklin Assessor
Source: MA Land Parcel Database, Franklin Assessor

Zoning regulations throughout the United States, particularly in older communities, often result in conflicting goals between a zoning district's regulations and the existing development patterns of that area. Franklin's zoning code and associated districts were first adopted by the Town's Planning Board in 1930, after almost two-thirds of Franklin's current structures were built. As such, many of the most beloved buildings in Franklin Center could not be legally built today because of dimensional or use restrictions in the zoning regulations.

Prior to Franklin's zoning code being adopted, the primary modes of transportation for the average American would have been walking, bicycle, horseback, or using a streetcar transit system. In that year, there were roughly 217 cars per 1,000 people in the United States, a number that grew to 380 in 1955 and to around 800 in 2010. As family and individual car ownership continued to exponentially increase throughout the 20th century, so did a greater focus on zoning regulations to cater to the experience of motorists above all other modes of transportation. The below photo shows Franklin's Main Street back when its streetcar system was in operation
 
 

This meant that the physical form for urban, suburban, and rural communities was altered to fit the needs of car owners. Parking minimums for developments were established. Roads were built, widened, and then widened again to satisfy induced demand. As the world became more car-friendly, car ownership felt less optional and more obligatory. Jobs, schools, and places where people chose to spend their free time were further and further away from people's homes. Today, if a resident in Franklin or in countless communities across the country wants to get from their home to a place of business, they are most likely taking a car.
Zoning's Impact on the Built Form
Impact of Dimensional Regulations
The "look and feel" of a neighborhood depends on how a person traveling in the neighborhood is able to interact with their built environment. Zoning dimensional regulations dictate the size a buildable property can be, where building on that property can occur, and even the architectural design standards that dictate how those buildings must look. The diagram below shows the various dimensions that are regulated by Franklin's zoning code.
 
dimensions that are regulated by Franklin's zoning code
dimensions that are regulated by Franklin's zoning code

Two of the zoning regulations which dictate the size of a property are lot area and lot frontage (see the Zoning Glossary below for definitions). They are both usually regulated as a minimum amount whereby a property owner would need to obtain a variance to build on a lot that has a smaller lot area or frontage than zoning regulations for that district allow. As we consider what this means for people traveling on foot or cycling, properties with a larger lot area are likely going to have more frontage, and as a result, it will take more time to walk past that lot.

Yards, also commonly known as setbacks, are a type of buffer that prevents a property owner from building anything too close to their front, rear, and side property lines and are also usually regulated as a minimum amount. Large front-yard setbacks can impede to access to a building by putting it farther away from the street. In commercial spaces, these setbacks are often reserved for parking lots. In residential spaces, it means larger front-yards. From the perspective of those who are interacting with their built environment, this means a longer walk across a parking lot to get to a store, or many long walks up and down driveways for trick-or-treaters come Halloween.

Building height and number of stories are dimensional standards that regulate how tall a building can be. Taller buildings with multiple stories can better maximize limited available land than a single-story building and are generally easier to obtain financing for from a bank.

On the other hand, buildings that are too high can also be unfriendly to pedestrians and cyclists, blocking natural light and creating a feeling of being lost in a "concrete jungle". The zoning code should strike a balance to allow for buildings to be built in a way that feels appropriate for someone who is interacting with them at street-level.
Source: Downtown Great Barrington Cultural District
Source: Downtown Great Barrington Cultural District
A streetwall occurs when you have higher-density, multi-story development lining one (or both) sides of the street with little, if any, setbacks in the front and side. This creates a wall of buildings that offer storefronts with visual entertainment for pedestrians and awnings that provide shelter from harsh rain or sun. See the following photo from Great Barrington, MA for an example of a vibrant streetwall.
The streetwall creates an urban form that encourages people to want to spend their free time there and transforms the sidewalk from a place of transportation to a venue for both daily adventures and special events (such as winter ice sculpture displays or a cookoff). Creating an environment where people will want to interact with the surroundings helps to create an area that feels vibrant and active and will also support the local businesses.
Impact of Use Regulations
Zoning use regulations explicitly dictate what can be built where. For example, a factory of a big-box store cannot be built in a residential district, something most would support. Such a use, with its odors, noises, and inherent dangers, could affect the quality of life for residents in a negative way. Zoning regulations help keep these land uses separate, often with buffers and space between them, ensuring that quality of life and the value of one's home is not negatively impacted by other land uses.

However, what we have learned in the one hundred years of enacting zoning regulations in the United States is that too much separation of land uses can have profoundly negative impacts on quality of life as well. As a society, we have used regulations to separate where we live from where we work, learn, and play, preventing the creation of vibrant neighborhoods and encouraging vehicle use.
One of the things that we have learned is that a mix of uses in a downtown area, including residential, retail, office, and even light-industrial, helps to foster a wider variety of housing options and create a built-in customer base that will support local business. It is hard for downtown businesses anywhere to survive when there are no customers that live nearby. A mixture of uses combined with residents living near or above them helps to create downtown destinations, that in turn make a downtown more attractive to new businesses, shops, restaurants, and residents. The photo below is an example of a mixed-use development in Franklin with retail uses on the first floor and residential units on the floors above.
 
Source: Franklin Downtown Partnership
Source: Franklin Downtown Partnership

 
Impact of Regulations on Housing Costs
Zoning regulations that unreasonably constrain what can be built on a site are directly tied to increases in housing costs. Setback regulations make the developable part of a property smaller than its area. Height limitations mean a person can only get so much usable space on their land since there is a literal ceiling as to how high a building can be built. Parking minimums mean valuable space is taken up that cannot be built on. All of these factors, combined with market forces related to supply and demand and personal preference on where people choose to live, inflate the cost of land and make development more expensive.

Fact finding missions to de-mystify zoning codes fall in the hands of developers, who must spend time and money working with architects, planners, engineers, and attorneys who can help determine what can be built where, and what the stipulations are for building in a certain place. The local municipality is a part of this, who must review submitted plans with accompanying permit fees that pay for the municipality's staff time. These processes can add hundreds of dollars to a small project, and thousands of dollars for larger projects, while adding time and uncertainty to the development process. The longer a project takes to get built, the less likely it is that the project will ever be built, a situation that no property owner or financing organization wants to be a part of.
Zoning Glossary
Accessory Building: Any building on a property that is reasonably related to the principal building on that property, such as a shed.

Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU): A self-contained apartment on the same lot as a single-family residence, either attached to or detached from the principal building.

Accessory Use: A secondary use of a property that is reasonably related to the principal use. A home-based business is an example of an accessory use.

Building Height: The vertical height (in feet) from the street-side of a building to the highest point of that building. The building or roof type may determine how the height is calculated, however, any part of the structure that does not enclose habitable space (such as a chimney, TV antenna, etc.) is not considered when determining building height.

Building Story: The portion of a building between the floor and either the roof or the floor above.

District: An area on a zoning map with uniform regulations which specify how the land can be uses and what dimensions a new building must conform to. All parcels in Franklin are currently assigned to one of 17 base zoning districts that serve residential, commercial, and industrial uses of varying densities.

Impervious Coverage: Anything covering the ground that surface water cannot penetrate, such as pavement.

Lot Area: The total area (in square feet) within the lot lines of a property, excluding any street right-of-way.

Lot Depth: The distance between the frontage line and the rear property line.

Lot Frontage: The portion of a property where the front entrance faces the street, measured along the street from one edge of the property to another.

Multifamily Building: A structure that contains three or more residential units, either for rent or condominium ownership.

Mixed-Use Building: A structure that contains a mix of principal uses. Generally, it refers to commercial use on the first story with residential units on the stories above.

Principal Use: What any property is primarily used for, such as residential, commercial, or industrial.

Rezone: The public process by which a zoning district for a property or collection of properties is changed, culminating in a vote by the Franklin Town Council.

Special Permit: A permit granted by a public board (usually the Planning Board) to allow for a use or increased density that is not guaranteed by right, but instead considered on a case-by-case basis.

Variance: A granted exception from the use or dimensional regulations for a property by the Zoning Board of Appeals. Not all regulations can be granted exception.