![]() |
https://www.franklinmatters.org/2011/03/introducing-voices-of-franklin.html
Providing accurate and timely information about what matters in Franklin, MA since 2007. * Working in collaboration with Franklin TV and Radio (wfpr.fm) since October 2019 *
![]() |
Dear Norfolk County Residents,
It is that time of the year when local budgets in the 28 communities that make up Norfolk County get voted on. If your town is like my town these are tough budget times. Communities are trying to wrestle with funding budget priorities.
The 28 towns and city that make up Norfolk County are paying almost 8 million dollars to the Norfolk County Commissioners and Norfolk County Government in a yearly tax assessment sent from Norfolk County. It is time for the communities of Norfolk County to examine whether this 8 million dollar county tax is better kept in the local towns to fund their budget priorities.
There has been wasteful costs to the taxpayers as these elected and appointed Norfolk County officials try to justify and defend their illegal and unlawful actions in a number of Massachusetts courts. In Fiscal Year 2024 over $200,000.00 was spent by the Norfolk County Commissioners on legal fees. Just this Fiscal Year 2026 over $159,913.00 has been spent by the Norfolk County Commissioners in legal fees through March 31, 2026 with 3 months to go in the fiscal year. County Director John J. Cronin and the Norfolk County Commissioners have voted and received an additional $50,000.00 for legal monies with their vote on December 10, 2025 and another separate $50,000.00 for legal monies on top of this with their vote on May 6, 2026. Is it time the 28 communities investigate wasteful spending and see what the Norfolk County Commissioners are doing and spending the taxpayers’ money on? After all each of the 28 towns and city of Norfolk County are potentially liable for the debts and liabilities of this Norfolk County Government.
The Norfolk County Commissioners accepted in 2023 10 million dollars for selling the Quincy District Court House. Could your community use any of this 10 (ten) million dollars? After all it was the communities of Norfolk County that built this court house and maintained all these years this court house. Yet the Norfolk County Government did not even ask or offer the local communities to share in this 10 million dollars.
There have been negative findings by independent auditors who have examined Norfolk County’s financial books. On December 15, 2021 Lynch Marini & Associates Inc. Certified Public Accountants wrote “…the County funded mandate was deficient in the range of $197,000.00 to $282,000.00 for fiscal year 2020”. Would your town allow such deficiencies?
The independent auditor Lynch Marini & Associates Inc. Certified Public Accountants reported another audit finding on August 21, 2023 “For the current fiscal year this leaves a potential range of misstatements within the County’s financial statements between $645,000.00 and $2.3 million between respective fund balances (General Fund and Deeds Excise Fund).” Would your town tolerate any such misstatements within your town’s financial statements?
Norfolk County did not like what the certified public accountants Lynch Marini found and reported. However, even the new auditor brought in by the Norfolk County Commissioners, Powers and Sullivan LLC CPAs and Advisors on May 3, 2024 reported a material weakness when they wrote “These large fluctuations indicate that this is a systemic problem in how the accounts are being used and not a one-time error”. Would your town tolerate systemic problems in town financial accounts as well as a material weakness audit finding?
It is well documented the various poor decisions the Norfolk County Commissioners and their County Director John J. Cronin have made when it comes to interfering with the Registry of Deeds and its operations. There has been unsound management by Norfolk County General Government that in this day and age should be striving to be efficient, effective and relevant.
The Norfolk County Commissioners and the County Director John J. Cronin have lost in a number of different courts in litigation involving the Registry of Deeds including a loss in the highest state court in Massachusetts, the Supreme Judicial Court. Norfolk County Government has violated a number of Massachusetts state laws by unlawfully interfering with Registry operations and misappropriating taxpayer public monies designated by state law for Registry use. When elected and appointed officials that run Norfolk County General Government make poor decisions, abuse their power and break the law that should be a signal to the people who live in the communities of Norfolk County to take a closer look at this layer of government.
Sincerely yours,
![]() |
| Voices of Franklin: Jim Downs on "5 Days of Action for Child Abuse Prevention" |
![]() |
| Voices of Franklin: KP Sompally shares his resilient journey |
![]() |
| Voices of Franklin: Thanking Franklin DPW for Snow Safety |
During that autumn
As the leaves started to
Change color and fall
Creating a carpet of crunches
While the temperature remained summer like
But without the thunder storms to
Roll thru and break the heat
Even if momentarily
While the drought monitors crept higher
And higher, inducing restrictions
On outdoor water use
During that autumn
Which definitely was
Created by the biennial election
There were multiple conversations
And the conversations ruled
Schedules to coordinate
Times to agree upon,
Zoom info shared, then connecting
Sound check,
Background check,
Lighting check,
Find the button and we're on
How to get at the questions
Folks wanted answers to
Without being so direct,
Abrupt, or unfriendly
We created the context,
The setting, neighbors
Meeting neighbors
Some closer than others
Some we'd met before
Some we hadn't yet
Until there, virtually, we were
Together to get their story
Their point of view
Recorded to share
Wind down to a close,
Then editing, Cut this,
Queue this, upload that,
Send this, wait for their response
And when the recording
Was approved, it was
Shared, some more widely than
Others, somehow that is always
The case, some candidates generated
More interest by being new
Less familiar than the
Incumbents whom folks seem
To know enough of
To not need anymore
When the recorded conversations
Came to a close
Other conversations began
Folks following up with candidates
Candidates following up with
Each other, making the meet &
Greet circuit, making the rounds,
To address all the questions,
Provide all the answers
On the website, the pages
Are rich with links
To the conversations,
Video and audio,
Along with historical data,
Info on what was done before
And may need to begin again
To further the conversation
And become closer neighbors
Than we were when
The conversation started
When the biennial election is
Over, the results tallied,
Perhaps they'll be a new set
Of folks at the table
Now with the task of
Providing oversight
To our Town, our services
Which we need, some of which
Some of us
More than others
And so by necessity
This autumn the conversations
Continue, neighbors with neighbors
To find the solutions
That can be possible
Steve Sherlock
Franklin resident
originally shared with the Senior Center Writers Group and posted to
https://www.quietpoet.com/2025/10/reflections-upon-gift-of-conversations.html
![]() |
| Voices of Franklin: Reflections upon a gift of conversations received from a friend called necessity* |
![]() |
| Voices of Franklin: Jane Callaway-Tripp says "Thank you, Franklin" |
![]() |
| Voices of Franklin: Cass's offer "kudos and thanks to the councilors for a job well done" |
![]() |
| Voices of Franklin: Kit Brady urges school families to vote on or before Nov 4 |
In June, Town officials told us all very clearly that if the override failed, we’d be looking at cuts that would take away services, personnel, and some of the things that contribute to the character of our community. After much debate, voters decided those cuts were an acceptable loss and voted against the override. But now that the cuts are rearing their ugly heads, these same “no” voters are feigning shock and claiming the cuts are political and punitive.
Absolutely no one should be surprised that the reductions they were told were coming are now here. That’s why it’s ridiculous and more than a little hypocritical that some people in town—including Town Council hopeful Jane Callaway-Tripp who came in last in a field of 12 when she last ran—are trying to shirk responsibility for the cuts they voted for going into effect.
This is what “no” voters chose. These are the consequences of their votes. When people like Callaway-Tripp write that town officials need more accountability, I have to wonder why she’s not looking in the mirror. The people who voted for this need to be accountable for their decisions, not falsely playing the victim and accusing everyone else of some sort of conspiracy theory when, in reality, they’re getting exactly what they chose.
I don’t believe for a second that the officers and employees of the Franklin Police Department are using the children of Franklin as political pawns to prove a point. That Halloween party has existed for decades and I believe the department loves putting it on and giving parents and kids a beloved tradition. I’m positive it hurt them to have to cancel this year’s festivities, and they very clearly explained exactly why it happened. They wrote:
“Following the results of the proposition 2.5 override the Franklin Police Department lost $250,000 out of our operational budget. This resulted in the elimination of 2 full-time patrol officer positions. With the two openings, two officers from the Community Service Unit/School Resource Officers were reassigned to the patrol division to fill the open vacancies and low staffing. The Community Service Unit was responsible for coordinating this large yearly party. With the reduced CSU staffing, events like this are simply not possible due to staffing restrictions. CSU Officers serve as School Resource Officers and their primary responsibilities are with the Franklin Public Schools. We hope that if staffing levels increase we will be able to throw this party and other community events again.”
But, according to Callaway-Tripp, they should’ve given townspeople a chance to reach into their own pockets and fund this themselves. Except her claim ignores the fact that voters had that precise opportunity in June and decided to do the exact opposite.
I hear a lot of talk about the need for audits and accountability if certain folks are elected to the town’s top board, but apparently that accountability is reserved for everyone else who disagrees with them and not themselves. Which tells me all I need to know when casting a vote on Nov. 4.
Please choose your candidates wisely because, even though they don’t want to take responsibility for them now, votes have very real consequences.
Aaron Gouveia
Franklin resident
![]() |
| Voices of Franklin: "votes have very real consequences" |