"When a robotics chief leaves the fastest-growing AI company in the world, it’s easy to call it “internal drama.” But her reason matters.
For the robotics chief, that principle had quietly disappeared. She chose to leave rather than have her name tied to what comes next.
The concern is bigger than one contract. Military AI rarely stays in the military. Technologies built for war — surveillance systems, autonomous targeting, and behavioral pattern recognition — often move into civilian life within years.
From her perspective, this wasn’t just a disagreement.
It was a refusal to legitimize a direction she believed could reshape society in ways the public never chose. " Shared from - https://www.instagram.com/p/DVm8K3QiDrm/?
"Anthropic has released a striking report on how AI could reshape the job market.
Groups most affected: women, white workers, older employees, and high-income earners.
But there’s an important nuance: the biggest impact may not be mass layoffs, but companies simply hiring fewer people.
The group most affected could be recent college graduates, whose risk is estimated to be 4× higher.
Entry-level hiring has already dropped about 14% since the launch of ChatGPT, particularly in high-risk occupations.
Safest jobs: bartenders, dishwashers, beach lifeguards, generally physical, hands-on work that AI cannot yet automate.
These roles account for roughly 30% of the labor market.
The most concerning part: AI already has the technical capability to automate many tasks, but widespread disruption is slowed by regulation and the gradual pace of corporate adoption. The main barrier is not skills, it’s acceptance and implementation
The report is based on real data but also includes theoretical modeling, so it should be read with caution. Some manual labor jobs still lack sufficient data for analysis." Shared from - https://www.instagram.com/p/DVjiNeYjd-g/?
Grammarly removes AI Expert Review feature mimicking writers after backlash
"Grammarly has disabled a controversial AI feature that imitated the style of prominent writers and academics, and is facing a multimillion dollar lawsuit from those whose identities were used without consent.
The feature, called Expert Review, used generative AI to produce feedback supposedly inspired by writers including the novelist Stephen King, the astrophysicist and author Neil deGrasse Tyson, and the late scientist Carl Sagan.
A class-action lawsuit has been filed in the southern district of New York against Superhuman, Grammarly’s parent company. The lawsuit argues that using a person’s name for commercial gain without permission is unlawful, and argues that damages due across the plaintiff class are in excess of $5m (£3.7m).
Since Grammarly’s feature has come to public attention, a number of writers have spoken out about being included."
