Showing posts with label Voices of Franklin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Voices of Franklin. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 4, 2025

Voices of Franklin: Call to protect your financial data

Citizens of Franklin:  We are facing a crisis, and we need all Members of Congress to fight back. Join your friends and neighbors in telling Senators Warren & Markey as well as our Representative in Congress, Jake Auchincloss, that we demand they use every tool at their disposal to fight back against the takeover of our government and the federal funding freeze. They must act now to halt the process on the nomination of Russell Vought for OMB Director and use all levers at their disposal to fight the assault on our communities.  

Elon Musk and his associates now have access to all U.S. citizens private and financial information, Social Security info, Tax Info, Addresses, Banking Info, etc.  He is dangerous and was not elected by any voter in this country.  

Please protect yourself and your families.  

Karen Landers
Franklin MA 


Guidelines for your submission

Voices of Franklin:  Call to protect your financial data
Voices of Franklin:  Call to protect your financial data

Saturday, November 30, 2024

Voices of Franklin: Registry Disaster Recovery office in Dedham to be "permanently closed"

Dear Norfolk County resident,
I am thankful for the privilege and opportunity to serve the residents of Norfolk County as their Register of Deeds.
It disappoints me to have to write this letter to Registry users and to those that rely on the land records at the Registry for title to their home. I was informed that the longtime Registry Disaster Recovery office in Dedham since it was established will be permanently closed by the County Chief Information Technology Officer (CIO) under the direct control and supervision of County Director John J. Cronin.
This Disaster Recovery Office was opened a decade ago as part of a business continuity plan should the Registry of Deeds building in Dedham become incapacitated. This Registry Disaster Recovery office was used during the COVID-19 pandemic and was part of the reason the Norfolk Registry of Deeds remained open and operational every work day during the pandemic. This story will sound familiar to those that followed the saga of the Norfolk County Commissioner and County Director John J. Cronin eliminating the direct report to the Register of Deeds Information Technology Department and staff.
This unfortunately is the sequel. The County CIO wrote that this decision had been looked at over the last 18 months. Yet in those 18 months neither I nor Registry staff were informed of any of this or even consulted by the County Information Technology Department or County Director. There has been no discussion about this matter with me nor my staff. Possibly the Disaster Recovery office could be kept in Dedham where the Registry has been located and doing land recordings since 1793 in addition to whatever planned new Disaster Recovery Office that hopefully gets opened.
This lack of discussion and transparency is a hall mark of Norfolk County Government operations. It is troubling especially when there was a recent "information technology incident" or breach of the Norfolk County Commissioners Administration office that was so bad employees are getting notifications at home from the County's insurance company to watch their personal accounts. It is all so troubling and compels me to let those who depend on Registry services to know about this development.
Sincerely yours,
Bill O'Donnell, 
Norfolk County Register of Deeds


Voices of Franklin: Registry Disaster Recovery office in Dedham to be "permanently closed"
Voices of Franklin: Registry Disaster Recovery office in Dedham to be "permanently closed"


If you have something to say, you can find the guidelines here
https://www.franklinmatters.org/2011/03/introducing-voices-of-franklin.html

Sunday, November 24, 2024

Voices of Franklin: 350 Mass Greater Franklin Node says thanks to State Rep Jeff Roy

November 21, 2024


Dear Representative Jeff Roy,


We understand Governor Healey signed the climate bill today! We want to profoundly thank you and the climate conference committee for working so carefully and thoughtfully to create the robust, cutting-edge climate bill this legislative session! We appreciate that it was a challenge to write into law the necessary gradual transition from methane gas to clean electricity, making sure the balance is flexible, well thought out, and smooth. 


We also want to acknowledge that the process was longer and more difficult than anyone wanted, and was at times contentious. Trail-blazing legislation does take time and significant effort. We thank you and the whole conference committee for sticking with it to get to YES!


This bill represents another groundbreaking step toward a just, clean energy future for Massachusetts. We look forward to continued collaboration with you in the future as we fight together for climate action and climate justice!


With gratitude,

Carolyn Barthel and Steve Derdiarian, Coordinators


Mark Minnechelli

Voices of Franklin: 350 Mass Greater Franklin Node says thanks to State Rep Jeff Roy
350 Mass Greater Franklin Node
David Rittenhouse

Marissa Bovie

Rand Barthel

Ted McIntyre

Megan McCarthy

Ray Milici

Kate Warsing

Rachel Plukas


-----------------------

 
If you have something to say, you can find the guidelines here
https://www.franklinmatters.org/2011/03/introducing-voices-of-franklin.html

Voices of Franklin: 350 Mass Greater Franklin Node says thanks to State Rep Jeff Roy
Voices of Franklin: 350 Mass Greater Franklin Node says thanks to State Rep Jeff Roy

Monday, November 4, 2024

Voices of Franklin: 4 Franklin women among crowd rallying to support women's rights

On Saturday, November 2nd, thousands of concerned citizens gathered across the nation to show their collective power.  Several hundred people gathered in front of the Massachusetts Statehouse to join forces in support of women’s rights, women’s health and well-being, and to support the strong women who are running for public office.  The event was especially focused on electing Kamala Harris, as the first woman president of the United States.  

Four Franklin women attended this Boston event to show their support for Vice President Harris as she heads into the last few days of the campaign. Our own Senator Becca Rausch was an honored speaker at this event. Senator Rausch has been a champion in Massachusetts for women’s reproductive health care, women’s rights, transparency in government, free childcare, public education, and many other social issues.  

The Franklin women who attended this event agreed that it is time to march forward into the future without looking back.  We hope that many others agree with us and vote accordingly.   

Karen Landers, Mara Downie, Sue Cass, Paula Gross 

4 Franklin women among crowd rallying to support women's rights
4 Franklin women among crowd rallying to support women's rights (courtesy photo)

Additional photos submitted can be found in this album ->

If you have something to say, you can find the guidelines here
https://www.franklinmatters.org/2011/03/introducing-voices-of-franklin.html


Saturday, November 2, 2024

Voices of Franklin: J Garland says candidate's claim is "empty words"

Here’s an example of empty words: the Republican candidate for State Senate claims to run on “accountability” and yet failed to satisfy even the most basic of her own accountability requirements: timely reporting of her campaign finances.

Candidates for the legislature were required to file pre-election deposit reports with the Office of Campaign and Political Finance by October 28. That deadline came and went several days ago. Ms. Videira has failed to complete this basic task.

If voters want a real, proven champion of transparency and accountability, they should vote to reelect Senator Becca Rausch. 

Sincerely,

Julie Garland
Wrentham, MA

Correspondence with Ms Videra returned this reply:
"I thank you for the courtesy update regarding the upcoming publication. When covering the story, please highlight that a recent loss in our family has delayed our filing compliance and we are working with OCPF directly to resolve this matter. "

Screengrabs submitted to support claim of noncompliance

OCPF page with requirement for filing within 8 days of elections
OCPF page with requirement for filing within 8 days of elections



OCPF page for D Videra showing no report activity as required
OCPF page for D Videra showing no report activity as required


You can search the OCPF site -> https://ocpf.us/Home/Index

If you have something to say, you can find the guidelines here
https://www.franklinmatters.org/2011/03/introducing-voices-of-franklin.html


Thursday, October 17, 2024

Voices of Franklin: Sue Dewsnap's comments on "Franklin’s Financial Stability and Future Planning"

As a taxpayer, I have significant concerns for Franklin’s financial stability and the lack of conversations and planning at the Town Council level on the topic.  After the failed override in June 2024, there was no municipal contingency spending plan available until 2 weeks after the vote.  It is now 15 weeks into FY 2025, and we do not have a published five-year projection.  The last quantified five-year projection was published on May 7, 2019 (link below). Without this information, how have you been making financial decisions?  

I attended the September 11 Joint Budget Subcommittee Meeting.  After the discussion, I left with an estimate of $4.0 - $5.0 million budget shortfall for FY 2026.  Let’s see how close I am when the Joint Budget Subcommittee reconvenes on October 23, which will be almost 4 months into FY 2025.  If my estimate is correct, a $4.0 - $5.0 million budget shortfall will result in town reductions of 40 – 50 employees.  Where are we going to reduce 40-50 employees?  Are you prepared for those difficult decisions?  How are you going to do collective bargaining with our employees?

I’m most concerned about the lack of interest, urgency and commitment from this Council to solving our Town’s financial challenges.  At the September 11 Joint Budget Subcommittee, we were told that the process to develop a projection and identify cuts to services “will take some time”.  I respectfully challenge this, as our finances are not that difficult to predict.  Next step would be to decide which departments absorb the cuts and the resulting service impacts to the community.  I see no reason why this information cannot be available for Council review by Thanksgiving.

It’s time to start elevating this topic and requiring accurate financial information from our Town Administration on a regular basis.  A $4.0 - $5.0 million shortfall will have significant implications to our town services and further erode our school programs.  Franklin will look less attractive to new families and our property values will decline.  That is not the Franklin that I want to see.  I ask you to put Franklin’s future financial stability at the top of your priority list.

Respectfully,
Susan Dewsnap


If you have something to say, you can find the guidelines here
https://www.franklinmatters.org/2011/03/introducing-voices-of-franklin.html

Voices of Franklin: Sue Dewsnap's comments on "Franklin’s Financial Stability and Future Planning"
Voices of Franklin: Sue Dewsnap's comments on "Franklin’s Financial Stability and Future Planning"

Tuesday, September 17, 2024

Voices of Franklin: KP Sompally offers insights on the use of medical alert devices

Empowering Safety and Well-being Through Advanced Technology

In an increasingly unpredictable world, safety and health are top concerns for vulnerable populations, particularly seniors and school personnel. The need for reliable emergency response systems, such as medical alert devices for seniors and panic buttons for educators, has never been more critical. As these systems evolve, integrating cutting-edge Artificial Intelligence technologies, they become indispensable tools for ensuring swift and effective emergency responses.

Protecting Seniors: The Role of AI in Medical Alert Systems

Medical alert systems are life-saving devices that provide immediate access to emergency services in case of falls, medical emergencies, or other crises. For seniors, especially those living alone, these systems are crucial in safeguarding their health and well-being. Modern medical alert systems now utilize AI technologies to enhance their effectiveness, going beyond basic functions.

AI-powered medical alert devices can monitor daily activities, detect anomalies in behavior, and predict potential health issues before they become emergencies. For instance, some devices can analyze gait patterns to identify the risk of falls, providing preventive alerts. Additionally, AI-driven voice recognition and natural language processing allow seniors to communicate their needs without having to press a button, making help more accessible even in cases where mobility is impaired.

These advancements not only improve response times but also empower seniors to live independently for longer, with the peace of mind that help is always within reach.

Enhancing School Safety: AI-Enabled Panic Buttons for School Personnel

Safety in schools has become a paramount concern for educators, students, and parents alike. Panic buttons provide immediate access to emergency services during critical situations, such as security threats or medical emergencies. Regardless of whether these panic buttons are used regularly, having them in place can save lives.

AI technology is revolutionizing panic button systems in schools by offering features such as real-time location tracking, intelligent threat assessment, and automated alerts to local authorities. AI can quickly assess the severity of a situation and prioritize responses, ensuring that the right resources are dispatched promptly. For instance, in cases of active threats, AI systems can analyze data from various sources—such as security cameras, social media, and communication channels—to provide real-time insights and facilitate faster decision-making by authorities.

Even when these systems are not in frequent use, their presence acts as a deterrent and provides a safety net that reassures school personnel and students alike.

A Commitment to Safety

Medical Alert Systems
Medical Alert Systems

As our society becomes more technologically advanced, the integration of AI in medical alert systems for seniors and panic buttons for school personnel is a natural progression towards ensuring the safety and well-being of vulnerable populations. These technologies offer the promise of faster responses, predictive capabilities, and enhanced communication during emergencies, ultimately saving lives and providing peace of mind.

It is imperative that we continue to invest in and support the development of AI-driven safety systems to protect those who need it most, whether they are seniors living independently or educators shaping the future in our schools.

For various Medical Alert Systems you can check this secure website ->   https://www.topmedalerts.com

KP Sompally
Franklin

Sunday, June 23, 2024

Voices of Franklin: Corey Bunnewith, new owner of Pour Richard's adds to the discussion

In-Tandem with Ann Williams response to Mark Lenzi's June 17th Franklin Matters post.  

Hello All, 

My name is Corey Bunnewith - Owner of Rye's Wine Inc. dba Pour Richard's Wine and Provisions.... The hopeful next chapter, iteration and continuation of Pour Richard's Wine and Spirits doing business at 835 W Central St in Franklin, MA.

There is a good chance over the last 12 years, if you've visited Pour Richard's at a charity event, seminar, or grand tasting - That I have met you over those years. Ann Williams has been a long standing customer of mine across a multitude of wineries that I've represented over the years. I've been lucky enough that my wines have graced her shelves and made their way into homes around Franklin and supported a multitude of local charity efforts.

I am hopeful that my wife and I will be able to be a part of the next chapter of Pour Richard's - A continuation of her efforts of community, charity, curation, and education. We hope to take that to a new level of being a place of learning, bringing local makers, agriculture, farms and families into the space. To continue curating and supporting wineries and breweries striving to make a difference and create products that become an accent to the residents of Franklin's daily lives.

The transfer of these licenses are not skewed to the support of big business, if anything this offers an opportunity to those with full liquor licenses to fill the void that Ann will leave. An opportunity to support local, crafted, unique spirits brands. And for Pour Richard's to expand its support beyond wine to local makers, artists, farmers and producers of items that elevate the in-home culinary experience. 

My wife and I look forward to being able to hire locally, mentor, and build a space that continues to create a positive influence on the town of Franklin.

Cheers,
Corey Bunnewith



If you missed the public hearing notice for the transfer of the license to BJ's you can find it here -> https://www.franklinmatters.org/2024/06/town-of-franklin-notice-of-public.html

If you have something to say, you can find the guidelines here
https://www.franklinmatters.org/2011/03/introducing-voices-of-franklin.html

Voices of Franklin: Corey Bunnewith, new owner of Pour Richard's adds to the discussion
Voices of Franklin: Corey Bunnewith, new owner of Pour Richard's adds to the discussion

Voices of Franklin: Ann Williams responds on the proposed BJs license transfer

This letter is in response to Mark Lenzi’s Voices of Franklin post from June 17. I believe there were significant errors and inaccuracies in that document, and would like to point those out before the license transfer hearing on Wednesday, June 26.

First, let me introduce myself. My name is Ann Williams. I own and operate Pour Richard’s Wine and Spirits, currently located at 835 West Central Street in Franklin. I founded the store with my former business partner in 2012, and have operated it as a sole proprietor since 2017. When Pour Richard's was first before Franklin Town Council (in 2012), we were represented by the late Neil Roche. Neil, an indefatigable booster of all things Franklin and also a wine lover, communicated with me that he was 'proud to help bring this type of store to Franklin, because it was time Franklin had a real fine wine shop.' I considered this opinion high praise, but also a standard to live up to. I was proud to count Neil as a customer until his death in 2015. I am also incredibly proud of the business and community we have built, concentrating on small producers, exceptional customer service, and education. In addition, we have donated an average of $5,000 per year to local and regional charities, and facilitated and hosted fundraisers which helped those groups raise even more.

But time marches on and life changes. After nearly 12 years in business, I want to sell my store and move on to the next phase. 

Mr Lenzi’s letter rather implies that BJ’s is asking the Town of Franklin to create an all- alcohol license for them. This is not true. The actual transaction being considered is the transfer of my current license to BJ’s, and the transfer of their Wine and Malt license to my current premises, where a new owner will take over.

These two licenses are located less than .5 miles apart, so the transaction will not change the footprint of licenses or service to town residents. Corey and Colleen Bunnewith, who are buying Pour Richard’s, want to continue the business substantially as it is, eventually replacing liquor with gourmet foods and other provisions.

The hard liquor business in Massachusetts is definitely moving toward consolidation and big box stores. When I started in the business, a single owner was allowed to control 3 stores. That total is now 9. Some companies (such as Liquor World) already own the maximum allowable. BJ’s fits that trajectory, and honestly, they will probably make more comprehensive use of the liquor license, stocking more mainstream brands than the boutique products I offer. They are a large corporation, but that doesn’t make them evil, or lazy about compliance, either. Searching through the Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission records, I could not find a single charge against BJ’s Franklin, or even evidence of a complaint. Meanwhile, the Bunnewiths-with many years of beverage and hospitality industry experience between them- will continue stocking artisan wines and craft beers, holding tastings and fundraisers and engaging with the wonderful Franklin community at Pour Richard’s.

The Franklin Town Council did deny a license upgrade to Big Y in 2022, but that transfer request was substantially different than this. They were attempting to purchase the license controlled by Village Mall Liquors, significantly altering the footprint of licenses in town. The transfer would also have resulted in two all-alcohol licenses being located directly across the street from each other, perhaps not the best use of those licenses. 

The current transfer requests would extend BJ’s ability to serve their current customers and also help a young couple attain ownership of an established small business. Please consider these facts before coming to a decision.

Ann Williams
Current Owner, Pour Richard's Wine & Spirits

For reference, the Mark Lenzi letter referenced ->   https://www.franklinmatters.org/2024/06/voices-of-franklin-lenzis-argument.html

If you missed the public hearing notice for the transfer of the license to BJ's you can find it here -> https://www.franklinmatters.org/2024/06/town-of-franklin-notice-of-public.html

If you have something to say, you can find the guidelines here
https://www.franklinmatters.org/2011/03/introducing-voices-of-franklin.html

Voices of Franklin: Ann Williams responds on the proposed BJs license transfer
Voices of Franklin: Ann Williams responds on the proposed BJs license transfer

Tuesday, June 18, 2024

Voices of Franklin: KP Sompally calls for Inclusive Voting Rights for local elections

Call for Inclusive Voting Rights in Town of Franklin's 
Special Election on School Budget Decisions

A significant issue has come to the forefront in the Town of Franklin as more than 150 families, who are legal taxpayers but not citizens, are currently denied the right to vote on crucial school budgetary matters. In a community where the school is a vital institution for all residents, it's imperative that every voice is heard and valued.

The school belongs to every resident of the Town of Franklin, regardless of their citizenship status. These residents contribute to the town's wellbeing and its educational system through their taxes, and they should have a say in how school funds are allocated.

I urge on behalf of these dedicated residents to grant them the opportunity to vote on school budget issues," said KP Sompally, School Committee Member. "Every taxpayer should have the right to participate in decisions that directly impact their contributions and their community's future.

This appeal is grounded in the belief that inclusivity and fairness are fundamental to our democratic values. Granting voting rights to all legal taxpayers on school budget matters will ensure that the voices of those who support our schools are heard, and their needs and concerns are addressed.
  • Inclusivity: All residents, regardless of citizenship, contribute to the school system and should have a say in its budget.
  • Fair Representation: Ensuring that more than 150 legal taxpayers have the right to vote on school budget issues will reflect a fair and just community.
  • Community Strength: Inclusive voting rights will strengthen community bonds and ensure that all voices contribute to the future of Franklin Town's educational system.
We call upon the Election Commissioner and all advocates of voting rights to support this crucial change. Let us come together to ensure that the Town of Franklin remains a place where every resident's voice matters and where our educational system thrives through collective effort, and inclusive decision-making.


Sincerely,

KP Sompally
Franklin School Committee Member


Updated 6/19/24

I want to clarify my request from yesterday because some of you sent me upset emails. I am totally against illegal non-citizens being able to vote in elections. I was requesting to let legal residents, who are paying taxes and obeying the law just like us, vote in municipal elections especially for the school budget issues. These residents are permanent residents in immigration terms. Several towns in Massachusetts have requested this change, but none have had legislation passed. Again, thanks for understanding.

https://malegislature.gov/Bills/193/H3899


https://malegislature.gov/Bills/193/H3899
https://malegislature.gov/Bills/193/H3899


If you have something to say, you can find the guidelines here
https://www.franklinmatters.org/2011/03/introducing-voices-of-franklin.html


Voices of Franklin: KP Sompally calls for Inclusive Voting Rights for local elections
Voices of Franklin: KP Sompally calls for Inclusive Voting Rights for local elections

Monday, June 17, 2024

Voices of Franklin: The Lenzi's argument against the BJ's liquor license request

Hello, 

This is regarding the liquor license upgrade request and hearing on June 26th 2024.

Introduction

Franklin Liquors, located at 333 East Central St, has been family owned since 1978.  Mark and Mike Lenzi are the owners, full time employees, and lifelong Franklin residents. 

History

In the past we fought Table & Vine (Big Y) in getting a liquor license.  At that time, it was the Town's decision that Big Y just keep beer and wine and liquor was not needed.  We would like the Town to also deny BJ’s from expanding to an all Liquor license.  

BJ’s Request

Please consider the points we make in this letter to you.  
BJ’s will tell you they want an upgrade to a full liquor license, as their customers are asking for it.  In our opinion, this request is because they can’t compete without it.  You may recall the Council received a request from Dacey’s Market to also upgrade to a full liquor license. That liquor license was approved and since sold.  The market is changing; if Franklin Liquors cannot object to a license on grounds of competition, how can BJ’s be approved for saying they can’t compete without it? 

Franklin Is Already Unique

How you ask?  
We have 4 “box” stores, Shaws, Big Y, Stop Shop, and BJ’s.  Three of the four already have beer and wine.  Please look at all the towns around us.  NONE have even had beer and wine and only Trader Joes in Foxboro has liquor.  Bellingham, Norfolk, Medway, Millis, Wrentham, Milford, Foxboro, Walpole have no big box stores with beer and wine. We are already very unique in allowing box stores to sell beer and wine.

Exposure and control of alcohol

This liquor license request to BJ’s would cause control and exposure issues.  You may ask, why does this matter?  
For that you must think of the safety of the community. People that don’t drink, those affected by alcoholism, and those who don’t want to expose their children to alcohol don’t need to and won’t go into a liquor store such as Franklin Liquors.  Those same people must go into a box store to purchase essential daily supplies. This will increase exposure. Please also think about workers in these stores- many underage employees will now be exposed significantly more.  Look for yourself how the box stores display and stock products all around the store and in uncontrolled areas.

The town CAN say no
BJ’s currently sells beer and wine, so this will not prevent the sale of alcohol at the store.  You will prevent them from increasing exposure by not allowing a full alcohol license.  As a corporation they also have the option to pursue this request in many of their other stores in Massachusetts: this isn’t their only store to expand in.  Here are some resources for you to see other towns who have denied supermarkets, and BJ’s in the past.

Recent Articles Towns That Rejected BJ’s

BJ's Wholesale denied expansion of beer, wine displays
Mickelson was displeased with the fact that beer and wine was being displayed throughout the store without the board's approval, but Richard said those displays had been there since the license was first approved and were taken down immediately after police warned the store.

Other Box Store Denials

As selectboard airs concerns about Big Y, Price Chopper liquor license denied

Articles on Exposure

Consumer alcohol exposure in supermarkets: legislatively adherent, but a societal problem
“Alcohol misuse is a well-known public health problem. Supermarkets provide relatively easy access to alcohol for consumers; this is linked to an increase in alcohol misuse”

Children's exposure to alcohol marketing within supermarkets: An objective analysis using GPS technology and wearable cameras
“One mechanism by which on-site alcohol marketing influences child non-drinkers to consume alcohol is by its conflation with everyday consumer goods sold at supermarkets,”

Effects of Alcohol Advertising Exposure on Drinking Among Youth
“Youth who saw more alcohol advertisements on average drank more”

Young people and under-age exposure
“Further, alcohol was found to be located near staple foods such as bread and milk, reinforcing the perception of alcohol as just another ordinary food stuff.”

Call to ban alcohol in supermarkets after cameras reveal over-exposure to children
“The over-exposure of alcohol to children put it on par with everyday products such as bread and milk, causing children to drink alcohol earlier in their life”
Note: This study also noticed by the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

The relationship between exposure to alcohol advertising in stores, owning alcohol promotional items, and adolescent alcohol use
“This study provides clear evidence of an association of adolescent drinking with weekly exposure to alcohol advertising in stores and with ownership of alcohol promotional items. Given their potential influence on adolescent drinking behavior, retail ads, and promotional items for alcohol deserve further study.”

Alcohol exposure in NZ supermarkets 'like advertising candy' to children, researcher says
“Children grow up seeing it offered every Friday, every Saturday, samples being given to adults," 

"Don’t market to youth”
Alcohol products should not be displayed in an area that contains products likely to be purchased by youth, such as sodas, snack foods or energy drinks — especially since some alcohol products can look like non-alcoholic drinks. Don’t display youth-oriented advertising for alcohol products in your store. Free product sampling may be inappropriate if youth are permitted in the store. Don’t advertise alcohol products in college or high school publications, or outdoors near schools or playgrounds."


Note On Exposure
Many town residents and councilors have made comments about alcohol miniatures (nips) on our streets.  That is an example of overexposure to our community through the form of trash and waste. People are already being inundated with the sight of alcohol in their daily lives. Take a walk into Shaws, BJ’s, or Table & Vine (Big Y) - seeing alcohol line the shelves in a big box is even greater exposure to the community, and our youth, who have no choice to avoid these stores, either for work or purchasing supplies.


Conclusion

Franklin Liquors would like the Town Council to consider denying this liquor request based on:
Great Exposure and Limited Control of Alcohol
Franklin Unique Box Store Licenses
The Use of Can’t Compete Requests
Other Towns Having Denied OR Regretted These Requests
BJ’s Already Has Beer/Wine-Not Preventing them from selling alcohol
Franklin Already Has Alcohol Exposure In 3 of 4 Big Box Stores- IF you approve the other 2 box stores will want upgrade to full liquor
Support of the growing “shop small” movement in Franklin
Thank you for your time in reviewing these details.  We hope you think of all the information provided and choose to deny this request.  

We would love to talk and discuss if you have questions. 

Mark And Mike Lenzi
Owners
Franklin Liquors
Vintage 1978
508-528-7338

If you missed the public hearing notice for the transfer of the license to BJ's you can find it here -> https://www.franklinmatters.org/2024/06/town-of-franklin-notice-of-public.html

If you have something to say, you can find the guidelines here
https://www.franklinmatters.org/2011/03/introducing-voices-of-franklin.html

Voices of Franklin: The Lenzi's argument against the BJ's liquor license request
Voices of Franklin: The Lenzi's argument against the BJ's liquor license request

Sunday, June 16, 2024

Voices of Franklin: Ruthann O'Sullivan writes a letter to the Town Council

Dear Town Council, 

I'm writing to request the following, and have summarized my reasons below.  
  • Town Administrator, Jamie Hellen, present four options to reduce the municipal side of the town budget ($1 million, $2 million, $3 million, $4 million) to allocate to FPS and help stabilize the district, and be presented at your next public meeting.
  • The Town Council vote to put another override on the November ballot for the upcoming presidential election.
  • The Town's Charter be amended to define an objective percentage of around 65% of the town's total revenue for annual allocations to the School Operating budget in perpetuity (budget line 300).
I'm writing to request that the Town Administrator, Jamie Hellen, present four options to reduce the municipal side of the town budget ($1 million, $2 million, $3 million, $4 million) to allocate to FPS and help stabilize the district, and be presented at your next public meeting. Similar to how our Superintendent presented 'The Tale of Four Budgets". These must be permanent reductions, not one time reductions in salary increases, 'rainy day' or stabilization funds. Assisting the school's operating budget with one time funding would be detrimental to our goal of stability for the district going forward.

I have heard from members of the Town Council that the Town Administrator had been preparing for this possibility and had these options ready to present. The community needs to know what the Town Council is willing to cut, to salvage school programs and positions. It's important this happen publicly and on record to avoid misinformation spreading among the residents of Franklin.

To give examples of misinformation that has prevented progress for our district, I'll point out two narratives that were detrimental to the override effort. 

First, our Town Administrator has consistently stated that the town's operational budget deficit is due to school budget mismanagement. 

To quote from one email "we have done the right thing to manage our budget and the schools have not."

To quote from Jamie Hellen's 2023/24 budget narrative (which was extremely editorial overall) the schools are "avoiding bold and challenging decisions and kicking the can down the road"  and that "the schools have continued to work in a bubble and not work with town leaders on town finances."

These "bold decisions" of course mean school consolidation. 

This spring, during an April Finance Committee meeting, George Conley, our finance committee chair, and Jamie Hellen, Town Administrator, chuckled over Mr. Conley's statement that he could redistrict 'with a crayon by drawing a line down the middle'. This was extremely disrespectful to the parents and students in our community, and to our Superintendent and his administrative team. 

Also, at the high school forum held this April to discuss the override, a citizen asked, "How can we be expected to open our wallets without knowing the results of the redistricting analysis?" Our Town Administrator answered, "I could have it for you in two hours." This question should have been redirected to our Superintendent, who fortunately was aware enough to speak up and clarify that the redistricting analysis and the proposed override were not mutually exclusive. However, this led many in the community to demand the results of the analysis immediately. The School Committee was told that without it, the Town Council would not support our request to fully fund the budget through a town-wide election. 

Though the timing wasn't ideal, the School Committee made the analysis public and worked tirelessly alongside our Superintendent to educate the community. We were also put in a difficult position, combating misinformation about the motives of the redistricting. The work was in progress and will result in amazing and equitable opportunities for our children's education. However, because of the narratives above, many in the community were accusatory and disrespectful of our decision, believing it was financially motivated. The benefits to our operating budget are minimal compared to the massive benefits this decision will have on improving the educational outcomes of our students.

Just as we saw with the closing of Davis Thayer, consolidation of schools will not solve the school operating budget deficit. The educators move along with the students, and therefore have little impact on our school operating budget (budget line 300). 

Our Town Administrator and elected leaders should have been helping the School Committee educate the community around the true cost drivers of the budget as they are systemic; transportation, special education, health care, out of district tuitions, technology, and mental health supports. Pointing fingers at our School Department was not helpful to our school committee as we advocated for our needs, and sought the support of the community at large.

Another topic that has been discussed many times in public settings inappropriately, is the teachers raises. These were negotiated in collective bargaining, and resulted in a three year contract of 4% each year for 2023, 2024 and 2025.

To quote a recent email from our Town Administrator, "the 12% raises for teachers put the schools in a structural deficit". Our structural deficit existed well before the 4-4-4 raises were negotiated.

Our superintendent responsibly accounted for the raises in his 2023 budget recommendation by making reductions of $800k. In that same year, our district was blindsided by an uncontrollable increase in 'out of district tuition' which amounted to just under $800k. Instead of educating our community on this point, our Town Administrator continued to speak about the teachers contract as "reckless" and "irresponsible". This rhetoric has been repeated by Town Council members to stakeholders in our community. 

Instead of disparaging teacher salary increases, Town Council members could have simply explained to those concerned, that police, fire and DPW salaries were already competitive with neighboring communities. Franklin teacher salaries were near the bottom of the list in comparison, and it would have been irresponsible not to begin addressing this discrepancy. Councilor Deb Pellegri stated publicly in the 2023 budget hearings that she 'was personally offended' by the raises. This narrative has perpetuated a distrust in our district's ability to manage the school operating budget, contributing to the failed override.

The School Committee has also been publicly blamed for our town's inaction to address this structural deficit by not 'writing a letter' to request an override. There is no legal requirement or policy that requires an override be proposed solely by our school committee. This commentary is untrue and unprofessional.

It was also unprofessional during the budget hearings of 2023 when at the last minute, schools were allocated less than had been previously earmarked for no reason, resulting in the lowest allocation given historically. The Town Administrator returned two weeks later and pulled $800k from fire and police for the school budget. Many saw this as retaliatory toward the teacher raises, and it was questioned by Councilor Frongillo for an explanation. This had our school administration scrambling in June to make budget reductions before graduation. This exacerbated the division among town employees, and needlessly caused the loss of at least two educators in our district. First, our middle school chorus teacher (who was laid off, and signed with another district before that money was "found" so we could try and get her back) as well as our middle school orchestra teacher, who left on her own accord citing this budget season's volatility as her reason for resigning. I would also be remiss to not mention that while scrambling to manage this fallout, our district was grieving the devastating loss of two FPS students. I mention this, because the undue stress that these frivolous actions have on our school district is inexcusable. 

I would like to officially request the Town Council vote to put another override on the November ballot for the upcoming presidential election. It's been said time and time again that the pot is not big enough. Our Town Council must advocate for the educators and children of our district. We are one town, and we need leadership more than ever to bring this town together. It's critical that all dialogue between leadership be transparent and conducted in public meetings so that residents are aware of how and why decisions are made. 

There is distrust in our leadership. We must have transparency, and accountability. Stakeholders were concerned that our Town Administrator was presenting incorrect projections around the potential override. He doubled down on incorrect numbers many times before conceding that Paul Griffith and I had identified the miscalculation. 

I would also like to request that the Town's Charter be amended to define a minimum percentage of 65% of the town's total revenue be allocated to the School Operating budget in perpetuity (budget line 300). This will instill confidence with the residents of Franklin that their money will be allocated appropriately and consistently to the schools.

This request is urgent. This meeting should happen as soon as possible, and the Town Council should meet before the regularly scheduled June 26th date.

I look forward to hearing from you all on how we can work together to create a more sustainable future for Franklin. 

Regards,


Ruthann O'Sullivan 
Franklin School Committee 


If you have something to say, you can find the guidelines here
https://www.franklinmatters.org/2011/03/introducing-voices-of-franklin.html

Voices of Franklin: Ruthann O'Sullivan writes a letter to the Town Council
Voices of Franklin: Ruthann O'Sullivan writes a letter to the Town Council