The vote for each position by precinct can be viewed in the following document provided by Town Clerk Debbie Pellegri.
Discover Simple, Private Sharing at Drop.io
Providing accurate and timely information about what matters in Franklin, MA since 2007. * Working in collaboration with Franklin TV and Radio (wfpr.fm) since October 2019 *
Board of Assessors | ||
Chris Feeley (write-in candidate) | 217 | |
Board of Health | ||
Bruce Hunchard | 1556 | winner |
Koren Kanadanian | 1150 | |
Planning Board | ||
Anthony Padula | 1570 | |
Joseph Halligan | 1780 | |
Planning Board (Associate) | ||
John Carroll | 1892 | |
Town Council | Votes | |
Tina Powderly | 1868 | 1 |
Robert Vallee | 1826 | 2 |
Glenn Jones | 1767 | 3 |
Shannon Zollo | 1648 | 4 |
Matthew Kelly | 1617 | 5 |
Judith Pond Pfeffer | 1553 | 6 |
R. Scott Mason | 1528 | 7 |
Joseph McGann | 1443 | 8 |
Stephen Whalen | 1437 | 9 |
Robert Avakian | 1378 | |
Daniel Ballinger | 1211 | |
Glenna Richards | 1182 | |
Bryce Kuchs | 592 | |
School Committee | Votes | |
Cynthia Douglas | 1927 | |
William Glynn | 1621 | |
Jeffrey Roy | 1616 | |
Paula Mullen | 1562 | |
Roberta Trahan | 1558 | |
Edward Cafasso | 1507 | |
Susan Rohrbach | 1412 | |
But here’s the tantalizing part: If done the right way, with the right limits, handing a preschooler a smart phone could be good not just for the parents’ sanity. It might even be good for the child’s development.
The Faithful Nine were Grace Buchanon, Joe Cook and his wife Ellie, Edna Fitzgerald, Marion Chilson, Lincoln and Bunny Dana and Robert and Emilia Dean. Emilia Dean and Bunny Dana are the only living members.
"They were determined this church was not going to die," Rosine said. "Their families grew up in the church, were baptized, had weddings and funerals...they were not going to let this church die."
Nearly everyone can probably recall a teacher who lit their passion for poetry or who was able to help them connect all the dots in a seemingly incomprehensible algebra formula. We know that individual teachers can make a huge difference.
But public schools in America have been bent on ignoring the obvious: Almost nothing about the way we hire, evaluate, pay, or assign teachers to classrooms is designed to operate with that goal in mind. Most teachers receive only cursory performance evaluations, with virtually every teacher graded highly. We use a one-size-for-all salary structure, in which the only factors used in raises are teachers’ higher-education credentials and number of years in the system, neither of which is strongly linked to their effectiveness. And we often let seniority, rather than merit, drive decisions about where a teacher is placed. It is in many ways an industrial model that treats teachers as identical, interchangeable parts, when we know that they are not.
Now, increasingly challenging this status quo is a new wave of research showing that one can actually measure the difference a teacher makes. The studies use a statistical analysis of standardized test results to measure the “value added” that each teacher contributes each year, revealing stark differences in their ability to move a class forward. According to one recent value-added study of Los Angeles schools conducted by Harvard economist Tom Kane, having a good teacher for a single year translates to a 10-point-higher score on student achievement tests that use a standard 100-point scale. “That’s a big difference.” says Kane.Read the full article in the Boston Globe here